Faced with irreconcilable testimony and resonance-altered record, Lexharrow’s academies and courts adopted a radical stance:
not all truths are safe to govern by.

The Admissibility Doctrine defined criteria for which records, memories, and accounts could be used in rulings.
Matters failing these criteria were not debated.
They were excluded.

This doctrine preserved institutional coherence at the cost of comprehensiveness,
establishing Lexharrow’s enduring reputation as both stabilizer and eraser.